top of page

2 - Doing 'Ethical' Anthropology?

This week we will be exploring how university ethics committees shape the ways we practice anthropology. As you begin your anthropology studies, it is important to pay attention to whose voices you hear often, as well as those that remain absent. This week we will be thinking critically about the role that university ethics committees have in determining what and importantly who Anthropologists may research, as well as how this research is conducted. This influence ultimately shapes the anthropology and ethnographic material we study and learn from. The required reading for this week will explore this by drawing on two case studies of researcher’s experiences with the ethics committee at the University of Melbourne.  
 
In preparation for this week’s tutorial in addition to the required reading, please brainstorm an idea for a hypothetical research project you might want to undertake in the future. Use the tutorial questions to guide your thinking.   

Module 2: Intro

Tutorial Questions

What makes an interesting and appropriate research topic for an anthropologist? 
Whose perspectives do we hear often within our discipline, and whose are absent? 
How can we study people and communities in an ‘ethical’ way? 
What makes some research more ‘ethical’ than others? 
How do ethics committees assist researchers to conduct ethical research? 
How do categories of ‘low risk’ and ‘high risk’ research determine whose perspectives and experience we are able to research and study?  
What ideological and epistemological assumptions are being reproduced within the current framework of ethics committees?

Module 2: Body

Required Readings

Click to Download

Fewster, E 2021 'Unethical Ethics Committees: Reflections on the Impact of University Ethics Committees on the Anthropological Canon and Beyond'

Module 2: Files

Recommended

Bell, K & Wynn, LL 2020, 'Research ethics committees, ethnographers, and imaginations of risk', Ethnography, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1-20.

Kohn, T & Shore, C 2017, 'The ethics of university ethics committees', in S Wright & C Shore (eds), Death of the public university? Uncertain futures for higher education in the knowledge economy, Berghahn Books, Oxford.

Simpson, B 2011, 'Ethical moments: Future directions for ethical review and ethnography', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 377-393.

Module 2: List
27545638_10155369637341309_2012279714240

Elizabeth Fewster

My research is interested in how people understand and make sense of experiences related to their bodies and health. My thesis seeks to understand parents’ experiences of making a decision about vaccinating their child. With this research, I seek to demonstrate the nuance, diversity, and complexity of the experience of making these decisions. I acknowledge the Wurundjeri people as the traditional custodians of this land, on which I live and conduct my research.

Module 2: Team Members

©2021 by Anthropology Honours students in 'Philosophy and Scope' at the University of Melbourne

bottom of page